top of page
Writer's pictureVenesia

Don't Bork it up!




How many SCOTUS nominees were rejected by the senate?

12!

John Rutledge - Washington

Alexander Wolcott - Madison

John Spencer - Tyler

George Woodward - Polk

Jeremiah Black - Buchanan

Ebenezer Hoar - Grant

William Hornblower - Cleveland

Wheeler Peckham - Cleveland

John Parker - Hoover

Clement Haynsworth Jr. - Nixon

G. Harrold Carswell - Nixon

Robert H. Bork - Reagan


How many nominees declined the position?

7

Robert Harrison - Washington

William Cushing - Washington

John Jay - Adams (he was being nominated to Chief Justice after his retirement)

Levi Lincoln - Madison

John Quincy Adams - Madison

William Smith - Jackson

Roscoe Conkling - Arthur


Tyler had the worst luck. One rejection, four withdrawals, two nominated without any action, one postponed and finally, one confirmation. President Tyler was so unpopular within his party that they actually kicked him out of the Whig party while he was still in the White House! This is mostly because he was the first Vice President to assume office after the death of the president. Within a year of his presidency, only one member of the cabinet had not resigned. Since the Whigs were in control of the senate, they postponed and ignored many of his nominations, flat-out rejected one nomination, and finally had the decency to confirm one of the 9 attempted nominees.


Another highly controversial nomination was Caleb Cushing - Ulysses Grant’s pick for Chief Justice. The Republican-controlled senate of the time confirmed 5 other nominees under Grant, but drew the line at Cushing. Cushing was a former attorney general who publicly criticized abolitionist and supported the 1857 Dred Scott decision. This nomination, which took place in the midst of Reconstruction following the civil war, was not warmly-received. The nomination was so strongly opposed that Cushing asked Grant to withdraw his name from consideration before the senate could even vote.


Finally, it is important to note that the last rejection was certainly not the least. In fact, many consider it to have been a turning point in the operation of the modern SCOTUS confirmation process. So much so that it created a new term to describe the process of vigorously questioning the legal and political philosophies of nominees in order to derail the confirmation: “borking”. This all spawned from Reagan’s nomination of Robert Bork - a steadfast originalist who did not show support for the Court precedent of the Constitutional right to privacy. Senator Ted Kennedy and other congressional liberals mounted an aggressive campaign against the nomination leading to the largest margin of any failed nominee: 42-58.


After Bork’s defeat, Reagan nominated Douglas H. Ginsburg (no relation to Martin Ginsburg). But the “borking” soon set in. Controversy arose surrounding a possible financial conflict of interest involving a case that Ginsburg had handled while working at the Justice Department. The metaphorical nail in the coffin, however, was the groundbreaking revelation that Ginsburg had smoked marijuana as college student and even as an assistant professor at Harvard. Ginsburg subsequently asked Reagan to withdraw his name before the formal nomination in order to avoid another heated confirmation battle.


Sources:


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


feca6a0f9bc35336634beedb995b61da.jpeg
bottom of page